That said, if you are willing to spend more, the 100-400 f/4L will beat the 70-200 f/2.8 IS II with 2x teleconverter in terms of quality and speed, but it also costs 3 times as much. For $450 the teleconverter is a great thing to have in your bag of tricks to go with your 70-200 f/2.8 IS II, particularly for the type of shooting you are doing.
This 16-35/2.8 III is for shooting action. The old 16-35mm f/2.8 L II is still a perfectly good lens, and it's smaller, lighter, tougher and less expensive. It's not as ultrasharp in the corners at f/2.8, but so long as you stop down it takes the same pictures.
Against its predecessor and the relatively new Nikon Nikkor Z 70-200mm F2.8 VR S (which at 1440 g is just 40 g less than the original Sony), the Sony FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II performs well and comes out in front.”. Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II Lens Available from B&H Photo | Amazon | Adorama.
Shop All Lenses. Mirrorless Lenses. DSLR Lenses. Lens Accessories. Binoculars. Monoculars. Premium glass. Intuitive designs. No matter what type or size of interchangeable lens camera you have, there's a superb, high-quality lens that helps you focus on, capture and unlock a world of possibilities.
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Canon EF 16-35mm F2.8L II USM Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS II USM Canon Extender EF 1.4x III Canon EF 24-70mm F2.8L II USM +4 more Canon EOS 5D Mark II If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form .
However, in your case I think I would go for the 7D Mk II and later get the ef 70-200mm f2.8L II. Sell your current 70-200mm f4L top help pay for it. I don't hold the same regard for the 100-400mil II especially if you buy the 70-200mm f2.8L II, later on. A better option is the ef 400mm f5.6L prime. And, it is cheaper!
. 220 22 2 375 144 90 29 252 374
canon 70 200 f2 8 is ii vs iii
